Bibliography (general list)

  1. Addey, C. (2018). Assembling literacy as global: The danger of a single story. In M. Milana, J. Holford, S. Webb, P. Jarvis, & R. Waller (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Adult and Lifelong Education and Learning (pp. 315-335). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55783-4_17
  2. Addey, C., & Sellar, S. (2017) Why do countries participate in PISA? Understanding the role of international large-scale-assessments in global educational policy. In A. Verger, A. M. Novellin, & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (pp.97–118). London, Bloomsbury.
  3. Addey, C. & Sellar, S. (2019) Is it worth it? Rationales for (non)participation in international large-scale learning assessments. Paris: UNESCO.
  4. Addey, C., Sellar, S, Steiner-Khamsi, G., Lingard, B., & Verger, A.  (2017) The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(3), 1-19.
  5. Akyol, Ş. P., Krishna, K., & Wang, J. (2018). Taking PISA seriously: How accurate are low stakes exams? (Working Paper 24930). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: https://www.nber.org/papers/w24930
  6. Alexander, R. (2012). Moral panic, miracle cures and educational policy: What can we really learn from international comparison? Scottish Educational Review, 44(1), 4-21.
  7. António, A. S., Estrela, E., Galego, C., & Teodoro, A. (Eds.). (2009). Educando o cidadão global: Globalização, educação e novos modos de governação ⌈Educating the global citizen: Globalization, education and new modes of governance⌉. Lisboa: Edições Universitárias Lusófonas.
  8. António, A. S., & Teodoro, A. (2019). Critical discourse analysis: Between educational sciences and journalism. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 8 (1), 18-35.
  9. Aruguete, N. (2017). The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicacion y Sociedad, 28(28), 35-58.
  10. Ávila, P. (2007). Os contextos da literacia: Percursos de vida, aprendizagem e competências-chave dos adultos pouco escolarizados ⌊The contexts of literacy: Life paths, learning and key competencies of adults with low formal education⌉. Sociologia: Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, 17(1), 307-337.
  11. Aydarova, E. (2020). Knowledge for the elites, competencies for the masses: Political theatre of educational reforms in the Russian Federation. Comparative Education, 57(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1845060
  12. Baird, J-O, Johnson, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Isaacs, T., Sprague, T., Stobart, G., & Yu, G. (2016) . On the supranational spell of PISA in policy. Educational Research, 58(2), 121-138.
  13. Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2017). Counting and comparing school performance: An analysis of media coverage of PISA in Australia, 2000-2014. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 432-449.
  14. Bart, D., & Daunay, B. (2016). Les blagues à PISA. Le discours sur l’école d’une institution international. Éditions du Croquant.
  15. Bart, D., & Daunay, B. (2018). Pode-se levar a sério o PISA? O tratamento do texto literário em uma avaliação internacional [Can we take PISA seriously? The treatment of literary text in an international assessment]. Mercado das Letras.
  16. Bart, D, Daunay, B., & Mhirsi, C. B. (2018). Les problèmes de traduction dans le PISA : Les limites de la standardisation des tests de compréhension. Lidil, 57, 1-18. Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/lidil/4936
  17. Bastin, G., & Tubaro, P. (2018). Le moment big data des sciences sociales ⌈The big data moment of the social sciences⌉. Revue Française de Sociologie, 59(3), 375-394.
  18. Bauer, A., Sousa, S. M., Neto, J. L. H., Valle, R. C., & Pimenta, C. O. (2017). Iniciativas de avaliação do ensino fundamental em municípios brasileiros: Mapeamento e tendências ⌈Elementary school evaluation initiatives in Brazilian municipalities: Mapping and trends⌉. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 22(71), 1-19.
  19. Benavente, A., Rosa, A., Costa, A. F., & Ávila, P. (1996). A Literacia em Portugal: Resultados de uma pesquisa extensiva e monográfica ⌊Literacy in Portugal: Results of an extensive and monographic research⌋. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
  20. Bettencourt, A., Miguéns, M. & Ramalho, G. (Eds.). (2010). Impacto das avaliações internacionais nos sistemas educativos.⌊Impact of international assessments in educational systems⌋. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  21. Bieber, T., & Martens, K. (2011). The OECD PISA study as a soft power in education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101-116.
  22. Borer, V. L., & Lawn, M. (2013). Governing education systems by shaping data: From the past to the present, from national to international perspectives. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.48
  23. Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2015). Pesquisa em educação comparada: Abordagens e métodos [Research in comparative education: Approaches and methods]. Brasília: Liber Livro.
  24. Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. Paris: OECD.
  25. Breakspear, S. (2014). How does PISA shape education policy making? Why how we measure learning determines what counts in education. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.
  26. Carnoy, M. (2015). International test score comparisons and educational policy: A review of the critiques. Boulder: National Education Policy Center. Recuperado de https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/international-test-scores
  27. Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., Loyalka, P., Schmidt, W. H., & Zakharov, A. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between international assessment outcomes and educational production: Evidence from a longitudinal PISA-TIMSS sample. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1054–1085. doi: 10.3102/0002831216653180
  28. Carvalho, L. M. (2012). The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.172
  29. Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Gonçalves, C. (2017). Fifteen years looking at the mirror: On the presence of PISA in education policy processes (Portugal, 2000-2016). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 154-166.
  30. Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Sant’Ovaia, C. (2020). Depicting the faces of results-oriented regulatory processes in Portugal: National testing in policy texts. European Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119858799
  31. Carvalho, L. M., Viseu, S., & Gonçalves, C. (2019). Bridging worlds and spreading light: Intermediary actors and the translation of knowledge for policy in Portugal. In C. E. Mølstad, & D. Pettersson (Eds.), New practices of comparison, quantification and expertise in education: Conducting empirically based research (pp. 111–126). Routledge.
  32. Cercadillo, L., & Jiménez, J. V. (Eds.). (2019). PISA como evaluación educativa supranacional: Luces y sombras en equidad [PISA as supranational educational assessment: Lights and shades in equity]. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2019.9
  33. Clarke, M., & Luna-Bazaldua, D. (2021). Primer on large-scale assessments of educational achievement. The World Bank.
  34. Coleman, R., McCombs, M., Shaw, D., & Weaver, D. (2009). Agenda setting. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 167-180). New York:  Routledge.
  35. Conceição, C.P., Ávila, P.  Coelho, A. R., & Costa, A. F. (2019). European action plans for science–society relations: Changing buzzwords, changing the agenda. Minerva, 1-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09380-7
  36. ⌊CNE⌋ Conselho Nacional de Educação. (2013). Avaliações internacionais e desempenho dos alunos portugueses ⌊International assessments and performance of Portuguese students⌋. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  37. Coe, K., & Kuttner, P. J. (2018). Education coverage in television news: A typology and analysis of 35 years of topics. AERA Open, (4)1, 1-13.
  38. Crato, N. (2020). Curriculum and educational reforms in Portugal: An analysis on why and how students’ knowledge and skills improved. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.), Audacious education purposes (pp. 209-231).  https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-41882-3_8.pdf
  39. Crato, N. (Ed.) . (2021).  Improving a country’s education, PISA 2018 results in 10 countries. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4
  40. Daniel, B. K. (2019). Big Data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101–113.
  41. Dixon, R., Arndt, C., Mullers, M., Vakkuri, J., Engblom-Pelkkala, K., & Hooda, C. (2013).  A lever for improvement or a magnet for blame? Press and political responses to international educational rankings in four EU countries. Public Administration, 91(2), 484-505.
  42. Delgado-Martins, M. R., Ramalho, G., & Costa, A. (Eds.). (2000). Literacia e sociedade: Contribuições pluridisciplinares ⌈Literacy and society: Multidisciplinary contributions⌉. Lisboa: Caminho.
  43. Elfert, M. (2019). The OECD, American power and the rise of the “economics of education” in the 1960s. In C. Ydesen (Ed.), The OECD’s historical rise in education. The formation of a global governing complex (pp.39-61). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_3
  44. El Masri, Y. H., Baird, J.-A., & Graesser, A. (2016).  Language effects in international testing: The case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 427-455.
  45. Estrela, E. (2012). From prescribed to narrative curriculum – An attempt to understand educational change in Portugal. In H. Cuadra-Montiel (Ed.), Globalization Education and Management Agendas (pp. 109-150). London: IntechOpen.
  46. Estrela, E. (2018). The knowledge of policies: The personal dimension in curriculum policies in Portugal. British Journal of Educational Studies. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2018.1444730
  47. Estrela, E. (2019). The two faces of the same coin: National and individual refraction in curriculum policies in Portugal. In G. McCulloch, I. Goodson, & M. G. Delgado (Eds.), Transnational Perspectives on Curriculum History. Abingdon: Routledge.
  48. Fadel, C., Bialik, M., &Trilling, B. (2015). Educação em quatro dimensões: As competências que os estudantes devem ter para atingir o sucesso ⌈Education in four dimensions: The competencies that students must have to achieve success⌉. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  49. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  50. Félix, P., Perdigão, P., & Lourenço, V. (2020). Desempenho e equidade: Uma análise comparada a partir dos estudos internacionais TIMSS e PIRLS ⌈Performance and equality: A comparative analysis based on the international studies TIMMS and PIRLS⌉. Lisboa. Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  51. Fernandes, D., Neves, C., Tinoca, L., Viseu, S., & Henriques, S. (2019). Políticas educativas e desempenho de Portugal no PISA (2000-2015) ⌈Public policies in education and Portugal´s performance in PISA (2000-2015)⌉. Lisboa: Instituto de Educação.
  52. Ferreira, A., Flores, I., & Casas-Novas, T. (2017). Introdução ao estudo – Porque melhoraram os resultados PISA em Portugal? Estudo longitudinal e comparado (2000-2015) [Introduction to the study – Why did PISA results improve in Portugal? Longitudinal and comparative study]. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
  53. Figazzolo, L. (2009). Impact of PISA 2006 on the education policy debate (Working Paper). Recuperado de https://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/citations/48055
  54. Fladmoe, A. (2011). Education in the news and in the mind. PISA, news media and public opinion in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 99-116.
  55. Freitas, R. G., Chaves, V. L., & Nozaki, H. T. (2019). Marginalisation in education systems: The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the failure discourse around the Italian education system. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(127).
  56. Froese-Germain, B. (2010). The OECD, PISA and the impacts on educational policy.  Canadian Teachers’ Federation.
  57. Fuller, K., & Stevenson, H. (2019) Global education reform: Understanding the movement. Educational Review, 71(1), 1-4.
  58. Galego, C., Ricardo, M. M. C., & Teodoro, A. (Ed.). (2018). Comparative Education beyond the numbers: local contexts, national realities and transnational processes. Lisboa: Edições Lusófonas.
  59. Gardinier, M. (2017). Looking back toward the future: Reflecting on the OECD’s global educational influence. In A. W. Wiseman, & C. S. Taylor (Eds.), International Perspectives on Education and Society Series (pp.247-269). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  60. Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116658299
  61. Gorur, R., Sørensen, E, &  Maddox, B. (2019). Standardizing the context and contextualizing the standard: Translating PISA into PISA-D. In M. J. Prutsch (Ed.), Science, numbers and politics (pp. 301-329). Cham: Springer Nature.
  62. Grek, S. (2008). PISA in the British media: Tower or robust testing tool? CES Briefing, 45. Recuperado de http://www.ces.ed.ac.uk/PDF%20Files/Brief045.pdf
  63. Grek, S. (2010). International organisations and the shared construction of policy ‘problems’: Problematisation and change in education governance in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 396-406. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.396
  64. Grek, S. (2012). What PISA knows and can do: Studying the role of national actors in the making of PISA. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.243
  65. Grek, S., Lawn, M., & Ozga, J. (2009). O PISA e o debate das políticas na Escócia: As narrativas políticas sobre a participação escocesa na comparação internacional [PISA and the policy debate in Scotland: policy narratives about Scottish participation in the international comparison]. Sísifo. Revista de Ciências da Educação, 10, 75-86.
  66. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). A quantitative look at the economic impact of the European Union’s educational goals. Education Economics, 28(3), 225-244.
  67. Harju-Luukkainen, H., McElvany, N., & Stang, J. (Eds.) . (2020). Monitoring student achievement in the 21st Century. European policy perspectives and assessment strategies. Cham: Springer.
  68. Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J. & Baird, J.-O. (2018).  Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer- reviewed articles on the programme for International Student Assessment.  Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353.
  69. Hopmann, S. T., & Brinek, G. (2007). Introduction: PISA according to PISA – Does PISA keep what it promises? In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & Martin Retzl (Eds.), PISA zufolge PISA – PISA according to PISA (pp. 9-20). Berlin: Lit Verlag.
  70. Hypolito, A. M., & Jorge, T. (2020). OECD, PISA and large-scale assessment in Brazil: Some implications. Sisyphus – Journal of Education, 8(1), 10-27.
  71. Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2017).  What happens when econometrics and psychometrics collide? An example using the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 61, 51-58.
  72. Jerrim, J., & Mossa, G. (2019). The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study. British Educational Research Journal, (45)1, 181–200. doi: 10.1002/be February 2019rj.3498
  73. Justino, D., & Almeida, S. (2017). International assessment, curriculum policy induction and instruction time management: Lessons from Portuguese experience. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 671-691.
  74. Kadushin, C. (1968). Power, influence and social circles: A new methodology for studying opinion makers. American Sociological Review, 33(5), 685-699.
  75. Kankaraš, M., & Moors, G. (2014). Analysis of cross-cultural comparability of PISA 2009 scores. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 381-399. doi:10.1177/0022022113511297
  76. Kevin, C., & Kuttner, P. J. (2018). Education coverage in television news: A typology and analysis of 35 Years of topics. AERA Open, 4(1), 1-13.
  77. Komatsu, H. &  Rappleye. J. (2017) A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education, 53(2), 166-191. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008
  78. Koretz, D. M. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  79. Labaree, D. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9).
  80. Leimgruber, M., & Schmelzer, M. (Eds.).(2017). The OECD and the international political economy since 1948. Cham: Palgrave.
  81. Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. (2015). International comparisons of school results: A systematic review of research on large scale assessments in education. Swedish Research Council.
  82. Lopes, P., Costa, P., Araújo, L. & Ávila, P. (2018). Measuring media and information literacy skills: Construction of a test. Communications, 43(4), 508-
    534.
  83. López, A., Llavador, J., & Teodoro, A. (2017). Educational quality measurement: On university rankings. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, (10)2, 283-300.
  84. Lourenço, V., Duarte, A., Nunes, A., Amaral, A., Gonçalves, C., Mota, M., & Mendes, R. (2019). PISA 2018 – Portugal. Relatório Nacional ⌈PISA 2018 — Portugal. National Report⌉. Lisboa: IAVE.
  85. McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
  86. Meyer, H.-D. & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global education governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  87. Morgan, C. (2011). Constructing the OECD PISA. In M. Pereya (Ed.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 1-14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  88. Moss, P., & Urban, M. (2020). The organisation for economic co-operation and development’s international early learning and child well-being study: The scores are in! Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 21(2), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949120929466
  89. Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of global education policy. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  90. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (vol. 1). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  91. OECD. (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  92. OECD. (2020). Education policy outlook. Portugal. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  93. Pereyra, M. P.,  Kotthoff, H.-G., & Robert Cowen, R. (Eds.). (2011). PISA under examination. Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  94. Rappleye, J., & Komatsu, H. (2019). Is knowledge capital theory degenerate? PIAAC, PISA, and economic growth. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2019.1612233
  95. Robert, A. D., & Seguy, J.-Y. (2015). Les syndicats enseignants et PISA: Entre réserves et usages choisis [Teacher unions and PISA: between reservations and chosen uses]. Administration & Éducation, 145, 77-83.
  96. Robertson, S. L. & Dale, R. (2008). Researching education in a globalising era: Beyond methodological nationalism, methodological statism, methodological educationism and spatial fetishism. in J. Resnik (Ed.), The production of educational knowledge in the global era (19-32). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
  97. Sánchez-Lissen, E.  (2020). La influencia de las evaluaciones internacionales sobre las políticas educativas: Una mirada a la educación en europa desde PISA [The influence of international assessments on education policies: A look at education in Europe from PISA].  Laplage em Revista, 6(2), 19-36.
  98. Santos, A. A., Neto, J. L. H., & Junqueira, R. D. (2017). Sistema nacional de avaliação da educação básica (Sinaeb). Proposta para atender ao disposto no plano nacional de educação ⌈National system for the evaluation of basic education (Sinaeb). Proposal to comply with the provisions of the national education plan⌉. Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira.
  99. Schleicher, A. (2012). Use data to build better schools [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/andreas_schleicher_use_data_to_build_better_schools/transcript 
  100. Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  101. Sellar, S., Thompson, G., & Rutkowski, D. (2017). The global education race: Taking the measure of PISA and international testing. Edmonton: Brush Education Inc.
  102. Sim-Sim, I. ( 2002, maio ). Por outro lado II: Entrevista a Inês Sim-Sim ⌊By the other side II: Interview with Inês Sim-Sim⌋ (A. S. Dias, interviewer) [TV show]. Retrieved form https://arquivos.rtp.pt/conteudos/ines-sim-sim/
  103. Singer, J. D., & Braun, H. I. (2018). Testing international education assessments.  Rankings get headlines, but often mislead. Science, 360(6384), 38-40. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4952
  104. Singer, J. D., Braun, H. I., & Chudowsky, N. (2018). International education assessments: Cautions, conundrums, and common sense. Washington: National Academy of Education.
  105. Sjøberg, S. (2015). PISA and global educational governance – A critique of the project, its uses and implications. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 111-127.
  106. Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should inquiry-based science education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings? Nordina, 14(2), 186-202.
  107. Soares, M.  (2016).  Alfabetização: A questão dos métodos ⌈Literacy: The issue of methods⌉. São Paulo: Contexto.
  108. Sorensen, T. B., & Robertson, S. (2020). Ordinalization and the OECD’s governance of teachers. Comparative Education Review, 64(1), 21-45.
  109. Sousa, D., Grey, S., & Oxley, L. (2019). Comparative international testing of early childhood education: The democratic deficit and the case of Portugal. Policy Futures in Education, 17(1), 41-58. doi:10.1177/1478210318818002
  110. Spampinato, M. (2019). Placing literacy in cultural contexts: To what extent do sub-national differences in OECD PISA literacy scores reflect cultural heterogeneity in cognition and motivation? In L. Palmerio, & E. Caponera (Eds.), Le indagini internazionali OCSE e IEA del 2015. Contributi di approfondimento (pp.87-128). Milano: Franco Angeli.
  111. Takayama, K. (2018). How to mess with PISA: Learning from Japanese kokugo curriculum experts. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(2), 220-237.
  112. Teodoro, A. (2001).  Organizações internacionais e políticas educativas nacionais: A emergência de novas formas de regulação transnacional ou uma globalização de baixa intensidade ⌊International organizations and national educational policies: The emergence of new forms of transnational regulation or a low intensity globalization⌋.  In  S. Stoer, L. Cortesão, & J. A. Correia (Eds.),  Crise da educação à “educação” da crise: Educação e a transnacionalização dos mecanismos de regulação social (pp. 125 – 161). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  113. Teodoro, A. (2003). Globalização e educação:  Políticas educacionais e novos modos de governação ⌈Globalization and education: Educational policies and new modes of governance⌉. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
  114. Teodoro, A. (2007). Nouvelles modalités de régulation transnationale des politiques éducatives. Évidences et possibilités ⌈Educational policies and new forms of transnational regulation. Evidences and possibilities⌉. Carrefours de l’Éducation, 2(24), 201-215.
  115. Teodoro, A. (2013). The political construction of European education space . In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education. The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 445 – 457). New York & Plimouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
  116. Teodoro, A. (2015). The construction of the global education or place of comparative education in the study of education policies (and practices). Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, (12)29, 859-877.
  117. Teodoro, A. (2016). Governing by numbers: the major international statistical surveys and the construction of a global agenda in education policies. Em Aberto, (29)96, 41-52.
  118. Teodoro, A. (2019). The end of isolationism: examining the OECD influence in Portuguese education policies, 1955–1974. Paedagogica Historica. doi : 10.1080/00309230.2019.1606022
  119. Teodoro, A. (2020). Contesting the global development of sustainable and inclusive education. Education reform and the challenges of neoliberal globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.
  120. Teodoro, A. , & Aníbal, G. (2008). Education in times of globalisation. Modernization and hybridism in the educational politics in Portugal. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 45(2), 103-118.
  121. Teodoro, A., & Estrela, E. (2010). Curriculum policy in Portugal (1995-2007): Global agendas and regional and national reconfigurations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42, 5, 621-647.
  122. Teodoro, A., & Guilherme, M. (Eds.). (2014). European and Latin American higher education between mirrors. Conceptual frameworks and policies of equity and social cohesion. Rotherdam & Boston: Sense Publishers.
  123. Teodoro, A., & Panait, O. M. (2017). Towards an analysis of the resistances against the educational standards issued from globalisation. Éducation et Sociétés – Revue Internationale de Sociologie de l’Éducation, 39, 5-18.
  124. Teodoro, A., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.) (2005). Educação crítica e utopia. Perspectivas para o século XXI ⌈Critical education and utopia. Perspectives for the 21st Century⌉. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
  125. Thompson, G., Savage, G. C., & Lingard, B. (2016). Think tanks, edu-businesses and education policy: Issues of evidence, expertise and influence. Introduction. Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 1-13.
  126. Torres, C. A. (2018). Carlos Alberto Torres em entrevista: Da educação comparada aos planos futuros de um “intelectual do mundo”⌈Carlos Alberto Torres in an interview: From education compared to the future plans of an “intellectual of the world”⌉ [Interview by R. M. Lopes, C. F. Silva, & M. G. Alves]. Educação, 41(3), 411-417.
  127. Tröhler, D. (2014). Change management in the governance of schooling: the rise of experts, planners, and statistics in the early OECD. Teachers College Record, 116, 1-26.
  128. Unesco. (2019). The promise of large-scale learning assessments: Acknowledging limits to unlock opportunities. Unesco.
  129. Wagemaker, H. (Ed.). (2020). Reliability and validity of International Large-Scale Assessment. Understanding IEA’s comparative studies of student achievement. Hamburg: IEA Research for Education,  SpringerLink.
  130. Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2.ª ed, pp.466-485). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
  131. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019a). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(2), 248-270. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882
  132. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019b). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5-30.
  133. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education : A political economy of global education reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
  134. Verger, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2018). Globalización, rendición de cuentas y gobernanza educativa: Análisis de un fenómeno en expansión ⌈Globalization, accountability and educational governance: Analysis of an expanding phenomenon⌉. Con-Ciencia Social (segunda época), 1, 59-73.
  135. Villani, M., & Oliveira, D. A. (2018). National and international assessment in Brazil: The link between PISA and IDEB. Educação & Realidade, 43(4), 1343-1362.
  136. Volante, L. (2017). The PISA effect on global educational governance. New York: Routledge.
  137. Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Hanitzsch, T. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of journalism studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
  138. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-33). London: Sage.
  139. Wuttke, J. (2007). Uncertainties and bias in PISA. In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & M. Retzl (Eds.), PISA zufolge PISA . PISA according to PISA  (pp. 241-264). Wien: Lit-Verlag.
  140. Xiaomin, L., & Auld, E. (2020). A historical perspective on the OECD’s “humanitarian turn”: PISA for Development and the Learning Framework 2030. Comparative Education. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2020.1781397
  141. Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10833-019-09367-x