Bibliografia (listagem geral)

  1. Addey, C. (2018). Assembling literacy as global: The danger of a single story. In M. Milana, J. Holford, S. Webb, P. Jarvis, & R. Waller (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Adult and Lifelong Education and Learning (pp. 315-335).
  2. Addey, C., & Sellar, S. (2017) Why do countries participate in PISA? Understanding the role of international large-scale-assessments in global educational policy. In A. Verger, A. M. Novellin, & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (pp.97–118). London, Bloomsbury.
  3. Addey, C. & Sellar, S. (2019) Is it worth it? Rationales for (non)participation in international large-scale learning assessments. Paris: UNESCO.
  4. Addey, C., Sellar, S, Steiner-Khamsi, G., Lingard, B., & Verger, A.  (2017) The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(3), 1-19.
  5. Akyol, Ş. P., Krishna, K., & Wang, J. (2018). Taking PISA seriously: How accurate are low stakes exams? (Working Paper 24930). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website:
  6. Alexander, R. (2012). Moral panic, miracle cures and educational policy: What can we really learn from international comparison? Scottish Educational Review, 44(1), 4-21.
  7. António, A. S., Estrela, E., Galego, C., & Teodoro, A. (Eds.). (2009). Educando o cidadão global: Globalização, educação e novos modos de governação. Lisboa: Edições Universitárias Lusófonas.
  8. António, A. S., & Teodoro, A. (2019). Critical discourse analysis: Between educational sciences and journalism. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 8 (1), 18-35.
  9. Aruguete, N. (2017). The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicacion y Sociedad, 28(28), 35-58.
  10. Ávila, P. (2007). Os contextos da literacia: Percursos de vida, aprendizagem e competências-chave dos adultos pouco escolarizados. Sociologia: Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, 17(1), 307-337.
  11. Aydarova, E. (2020). Knowledge for the elites, competencies for the masses: Political theatre of educational reforms in the Russian Federation. Comparative Education, 57(1), 1-16.
  12. Baird, J-O, Johnson, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Isaacs, T., Sprague, T., Stobart, G., & Yu, G. (2016). On the supranational spell of PISA in policy. Educational Research, 58(2), 121-138.
  13. Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2017). Counting and comparing school performance: An analysis of media coverage of PISA in Australia, 2000-2014. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 432-449.
  14. Bart, D., & Daunay, B. (2016). Les blagues à PISA. Le discours sur l’école d’une institution international. Éditions du Croquant.
  15. Bart, D., & Daunay, B. (2018). Pode-se levar a sério o PISA? O tratamento do texto literário em uma avaliação internacional. Mercado das Letras
  16. Bart, D, Daunay, B., & Mhirsi, C. B. (2018). Les problèmes de traduction dans le PISA : Les limites de la standardisation des tests de compréhension. Lidil, 57, 1-18. Recuperado de
  17. Bastin, G., & Tubaro, P. (2018). Le moment big data des sciences socialesRevue Française de Sociologie, 59(3), 375-394.
  18. Bauer, A., Sousa, S. M., Neto, J. L. H., Valle, R. C., & Pimenta, C. O. (2017). Iniciativas de avaliação do ensino fundamental em municípios brasileiros: Mapeamento e tendências. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 22(71), 1-19.
  19. Benavente, A., Rosa, A., Costa, A. F., & Ávila, P. (1996). A Literacia em Portugal: Resultados de uma pesquisa extensiva e monográfica. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
  20. Bettencourt, A., Miguéns, M., & Ramalho, G. (Eds.). (2010). Impacto das avaliações internacionais nos sistemas educativos. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  21. Bieber, T., & Martens, K. (2011). The OECD PISA study as a soft power in education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101-116.
  22. Borer, V. L., & Lawn, M. (2013). Governing education systems by shaping data: From the past to the present, from national to international perspectives. European Educational Research Journal12(1), 48-52.
  23. Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2015). Pesquisa em educação comparada: Abordagens e métodos. Brasília: Liber Livro.
  24. Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. Paris: OECD..
  25. Breakspear, S. (2014). How does PISA shape education policy making? Why how we measure learning determines what counts in education. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.
  26. Carnoy, M. (2015). International test score comparisons and educational policy: A review of the critiques. Boulder: National Education Policy Center. Recuperado de
  27. Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., Loyalka, P., Schmidt, W. H., & Zakharov, A. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between international assessment outcomes and educational production: Evidence from a longitudinal PISA-TIMSS sample. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1054–1085. doi: 10.3102/0002831216653180
  28. Carvalho, L. M. (2012). The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal11(2), 172-188.
  29. Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Gonçalves, C. (2017). Fifteen years looking at the mirror: On the presence of PISA in education policy processes (Portugal, 2000-2016). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 154-166.
  30. Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Sant’Ovaia, C. (2020). Depicting the faces of results-oriented regulatory processes in Portugal: National testing in policy texts. European Educational Research Journal19(2), 125-141.
  31. Carvalho, L. M., Viseu, S., & Gonçalves, C. (2019). Bridging worlds and spreading light: Intermediary actors and the translation of knowledge for policy in Portugal. In C. E. Mølstad, & D. Pettersson (Eds.), New practices of comparison, quantification and expertise in education: Conducting empirically based research (pp. 111–126). Routledge.
  32. Cercadillo, L., & Jiménez, J. V. (Eds.). (2019). PISA como evaluación educativa supranacional: Luces y sombras en equidad. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education, 9.
  33. Clarke, M., & Luna-Bazaldua, D. (2021). Primer on large-scale assessments of educational achievement. The World Bank.
  34. Coleman, R., McCombs, M., Shaw, D., & Weaver, D. (2009). Agenda setting. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 167-180). New York:  Routledge.
  35. Conceição, C.P., Ávila, P.  Coelho, A. R., & Costa, A. F. (2019). European action plans for science–society relations: Changing buzzwords, changing the agenda. Minerva, 1-24. doi:
  36. ⌊CNE⌋ Conselho Nacional de Educação. (2013). Avaliações internacionais e desempenho dos alunos portugueses. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  37. Coe, K., & Kuttner, P. J. (2018). Education coverage in television news: A typology and analysis of 35 years of topics. AERA Open, (4)1, 1-13.
  38. Crato, N. (2020). Curriculum and educational reforms in Portugal: An analysis on why and how students’ knowledge and skills improved. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.), Audacious education purposes (pp. 209-231).
  39. Crato, N. (Ed.) . (2021).  Improving a country’s education, PISA 2018 results in 10 countries. Cham: Springer.
  40. Daniel, B. K. (2019). Big Data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101–113.
  41. Delgado-Martins, M. R., Ramalho, G., & Costa, A. (Eds.). (2000). Literacia e sociedade: Contribuições pluridisciplinares. Lisboa: Caminho.
  42. Dixon, R., Arndt, C., Mullers, M., Vakkuri, J., Engblom-Pelkkala, K., & Hooda, C. (2013).  A lever for improvement or a magnet for blame? Press and political responses to international educational rankings in four EU countries. Public Administration, 91(2), 484-505.
  43. Elfert, M. (2019). The OECD, American power and the rise of the “economics of education” in the 1960s. In C. Ydesen (Ed.), The OECD’s historical rise in education. The formation of a global governing complex (pp.39-61).
  44. El Masri, Y. H., Baird, J.-A., & Graesser, A. (2016).  Language effects in international testing: The case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 427-455.
  45. Estrela, E. (2012). From prescribed to narrative curriculum – An attempt to understand educational change in Portugal. In H. Cuadra-Montiel (Ed.), Globalization Education and Management Agendas (pp. 109-150). London: IntechOpen.
  46. Estrela, E. (2018). The knowledge of policies: The personal dimension in curriculum policies in Portugal. British Journal of Educational Studies. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2018.1444730
  47. Estrela, E. (2019). The two faces of the same coin: National and individual refraction in curriculum policies in Portugal. In G. McCulloch, I. Goodson, & M. G. Delgado (Eds.), Transnational Perspectives on Curriculum History. Abingdon: Routledge.
  48. Fadel, C., Bialik, M., & Trilling, B. (2015). Educação em quatro dimensões: As competências que os estudantes devem ter para atingir o sucesso. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  49. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  50. Félix, P., Perdigão, P., & Lourenço, V. (2020). Desempenho e equidade: Uma análise comparada a partir dos estudos internacionais TIMSS e PIRLS. Lisboa. Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  51. Fernandes, D., Neves, C., Tinoca, L., Viseu, S., & Henriques, S. (2019). Políticas educativas e desempenho de Portugal no PISA (2000-2015). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação.
  52. Ferreira, A., Flores, I., & Casas-Novas, T. (2017). Introdução ao estudo – Porque melhoraram os resultados PISA em Portugal? Estudo longitudinal e comparado (2000-2015). Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
  53. Figazzolo, L. (2009). Impact of PISA 2006 on the education policy debate (Working Paper). Recuperado de
  54. Fladmoe, A. (2011). Education in the news and in the mind. PISA, news media and public opinion in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 99-116.
  55. Freitas, R. G., Chaves, V. L., & Nozaki, H. T. (2019). Marginalisation in education systems: The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the failure discourse around the Italian education system. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(127).
  56. Froese-Germain, B. (2010). The OECD, PISA and the impacts on educational policy.  Canadian Teachers’ Federation.
  57. Fuller, K., & Stevenson, H. (2019) Global education reform: Understanding the movement. Educational Review, 71(1), 1-4.
  58. Galego, C., Ricardo, M. M. C., & Teodoro, A. (Ed.). (2018). A educação comparada para além dos números: Contextos locais, realidades nacionais e processos transnacionais. Lisboa: Edições Lusófonas.
  59. Gardinier, M. (2017). Looking back toward the future: Reflecting on the OECD’s global educational influence. In A. W. Wiseman, & C. S. Taylor (Eds.), International Perspectives on Education and Society Series (pp.247-269). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  60. Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal15(5), 598-616.
  61. Gorur, R., Sørensen, E, &  Maddox, B. (2019). Standardizing the context and contextualizing the standard: Translating PISA into PISA-D. In M. J. Prutsch (Ed.), Science, numbers and politics (pp. 301-329). Cham: Springer Nature.
  62. Grek, S. (2008). PISA in the British media: Tower or robust testing tool? CES Briefing, 45. Recuperado de
  63. Grek, S. (2010). International organisations and the shared construction of policy ‘problems’: Problematisation and change in education governance in Europe. European Educational Research Journal9(3), 396-406.
  64. Grek, S. (2012). What PISA knows and can do: Studying the role of national actors in the making of PISA. European Educational Research Journal11(2), 243-254.
  65. Grek, S., Lawn, M., & Ozga, J. (2009). O PISA e o debate das políticas na Escócia: As narrativas políticas sobre a participação escocesa na comparação internacional. Sísifo. Revista de Ciências da Educação, 10, 75-86.
  66. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). A quantitative look at the economic impact of the European Union’s educational goals. Education Economics, 28(3), 225-244.
  67. Harju-Luukkainen, H., McElvany, N., & Stang, J. (Eds.) . (2020). Monitoring student achievement in the 21st Century. European policy perspectives and assessment strategies. Cham: Springer.
  68. Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J. & Baird, J.-O. (2018).  Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer- reviewed articles on the programme for International Student AssessmentScandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353.
  69. Hopmann, S. T., & Brinek, G. (2007). Introduction: PISA according to PISA – Does PISA keep what it promises? In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & Martin Retzl (Eds.), PISA zufolge PISA – PISA according to PISA (pp. 9-20). Berlin: Lit Verlag.
  70. Hypolito, A. M., & Jorge, T. (2020). OCDE, PISA e avaliação em larga escala no Brasil: Algumas implicações. Sisyphus – Journal of Education, 8(1), 10-27.
  71. Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2017).  What happens when econometrics and psychometrics collide? An example using the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 61, 51-58.
  72. Jerrim, J., & Mossa, G. (2019). The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study. British Educational Research Journal, (45)1, 181–200. doi: 10.1002/be February 2019rj.3498
  73. Justino, D., & Almeida, S. (2017). International assessment, curriculum policy induction and instruction time management: Lessons from Portuguese experience. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 671-691.
  74. Kadushin, C. (1968). Power, influence and social circles: A new methodology for studying opinion makers. American Sociological Review, 33(5), 685-69
  75. Kankaraš, M., & Moors, G. (2014). Analysis of cross-cultural comparability of PISA 2009 scores. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 381-399. doi:10.1177/0022022113511297.
  76. Kevin, C., & Kuttner, P. J. (2018). Education coverage in television news: A typology and analysis of 35 Years of topics. AERA Open, 4(1), 1-13.
  77. Komatsu, H. &  Rappleye. J. (2017) A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education, 53(2), 166-191. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008
  78. Koretz, D. M. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  79. Labaree, D. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9).
  80. Leimgruber, M., & Schmelzer, M. (Eds.).(2017). The OECD and the international political economy since 1948. Cham: Palgrave.
  81. Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. (2015). International comparisons of school results: A systematic review of research on large scale assessments in education. Swedish Research Council.
  82. Lopes, P., Costa, P., Araújo, L. & Ávila, P. (2018). Measuring media and information literacy skills: Construction of a test. Communications, 43(4), 508-534
  83. López, A., Llavador, J., & Teodoro, A. (2017). La medida de la calidad educativa: Acerca de los rankings universitários. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, (10)2, 283-300.
  84. Lourenço, V., Duarte, A., Nunes, A., Amaral, A., Gonçalves, C., Mota, M., & Mendes, R. (2019). PISA 2018 – Portugal. Relatório Nacional. Lisboa: IAVE.
  85. McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557.
  86. Meyer, H.-D. & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global education governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  87. Morgan, C. (2011). Constructing the OECD PISA. In M. Pereya (Ed.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 1-14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  88. Moss, P., & Urban, M. (2020). The organisation for economic co-operation and development’s international early learning and child well-being study: The scores are in! Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood21(2), 165-171.
  89. Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of global education policy. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  90. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (vol. 1). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  91. OECD. (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  92. OECD. (2020). Education policy outlook. Portugal. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  93. Pereyra, M. P.,  Kotthoff, H.-G., & Robert Cowen, R. (Eds.). (2011). PISA under examination. Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  94. Rappleye, J., & Komatsu, H. (2019). Is knowledge capital theory degenerate? PIAAC, PISA, and economic growth. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2019.1612233
  95. Robert, A. D., & Seguy, J.-Y. (2015). Les syndicats enseignants et PISA: Entre réserves et usages choisis. Administration & Éducation, 145, 77-83.
  96. Robertson, S. L. & Dale, R. (2008). Researching education in a globalising era: Beyond methodological nationalism, methodological statism, methodological educationism and spatial fetishism. in J. Resnik (Ed.), The production of educational knowledge in the global era (19-32). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
  97. Sánchez-Lissen, E. (2020). La influencia de las evaluaciones internacionales sobre las políticas educativas: Una mirada a la educación en europa desde PISA.  Laplage em Revista, 6(2), 19-36.
  98. Santos, A. A., Neto, J. L. H., & Junqueira, R. D. (2017). Sistema nacional de avaliação da educação básica (Sinaeb). Proposta para atender ao disposto no Plano Nacional de Educação. Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira.
  99. Schleicher, A. (2012). Utilizem os dados para contruir escolas melhores [Vídeo]. Recuperado de
  100. Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  101. Sellar, S., Thompson, G., & Rutkowski, D. (2017). The global education race: Taking the measure of PISA and international testing. Edmonton: Brush Education Inc.
  102. Sim-Sim, I. ( 2002, maio ). Por outro lado II: Entrevista a Inês Sim-Sim (A. S. Dias, entrevistadora) [Programa televisivo]. Recuperado de
  103. Singer, J. D., & Braun, H. I. (2018). Testing international education assessments.  Rankings get headlines, but often mislead. Science, 360(6384), 38-40. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4952
  104. Singer, J. D., Braun, H. I., & Chudowsky, N. (2018). International education assessments: Cautions, conundrums, and common sense. Washington: National Academy of Education.
  105. Sjøberg, S. (2015). PISA and global educational governance – A critique of the project, its uses and implications. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 111-127.
  106. Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should inquiry-based science education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings? Nordina, 14(2), 186-202.
  107. Soares, M.  (2016). Alfabetização: A questão dos métodos. São Paulo: Contexto.
  108. Sorensen, T. B., & Robertson, S. (2020). Ordinalization and the OECD’s governance of teachers. Comparative Education Review, 64(1), 21-45.
  109. Sousa, D., Grey, S., & Oxley, L. (2019). Comparative international testing of early childhood education: The democratic deficit and the case of Portugal. Policy Futures in Education, 17(1), 41-58. doi:10.1177/1478210318818002
  110. Spampinato, M. (2019). Placing literacy in cultural contexts: To what extent do sub-national differences in OECD PISA literacy scores reflect cultural heterogeneity in cognition and motivation? In L. Palmerio, & E. Caponera (Eds.), Le indagini internazionali OCSE e IEA del 2015. Contributi di approfondimento (pp.87-128). Milano: Franco Angeli.
  111. Takayama, K. (2018). How to mess with PISA: Learning from Japanese kokugo curriculum experts. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(2), 220-237.
  112. Teodoro, A. (2001).  Organizações internacionais e políticas educativas nacionais: A emergência de novas formas de regulação transnacional ou uma globalização de baixa intensidade.  In  S. Stoer, L. Cortesão, & J. A. Correia (Eds.),  Crise da educação à “educação” da crise: Educação e a transnacionalização dos mecanismos de regulação social (pp. 125 – 161). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  113. Teodoro, A. (2003). Globalização e educação:  Políticas educacionais e novos modos de governação. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
  114. Teodoro, A. (2007). Nouvelles modalités de régulation transnationale des politiques éducatives. Évidences et possibilités. Carrefours de l’Éducation, 2(24), 201-215.
  115. Teodoro, A. (2013). The political construction of European education space . In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education. The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 445 – 457). New York & Plimouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
  116. Teodoro, A. (2015). A construção da educação mundial ou o lugar da Educação Comparada no estudo das políticas (e práticas) de educação. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, (12)29, 859-877.
  117. Teodoro, A. (2016). Governando por números: Os grandes inquéritos estatísticos internacionais e a construção de uma agenda global nas políticas de educação. Em Aberto, (29)96, 41-52.
  118. Teodoro, A. (2019). The end of isolationism: examining the OECD influence in Portuguese education policies, 1955–1974. Paedagogica Historica. doi : 10.1080/00309230.2019.1606022
  119. Teodoro, A. (2020). Contesting the global development of sustainable and inclusive education. Education reform and the challenges of neoliberal globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.
  120. Teodoro, A. , & Aníbal, G. (2008). A educação em tempos de globalização. Modernização e hibridismo nas políticas educativas em Portugal. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 48, 73-91.
  121. Teodoro, A., & Estrela, E. (2010). Curriculum policy in Portugal (1995-2007): Global agendas and regional and national reconfigurations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42, 5, 621-647.
  122. Teodoro, A., & Guilherme, M. (Eds.). (2014). European and Latin American higher education between mirrors. Conceptual frameworks and policies of equity and social cohesion. Rotherdam & Boston: Sense Publishers.
  123. Teodoro, A., & Panait, O. M. (2017). Vers l’analyse des résistances aux normes éducatives issues de la globalisationÉducation et Socétés – Revue Internationale de Sociologie de l’Éducation, 39, 5-18.
  124. Teodoro, A., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.) (2005). Educação crítica e utopia. Perspectivas para o século XXI. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
  125. Thompson, G., Savage, G. C., & Lingard, B. (2016). Think tanks, edu-businesses and education policy: Issues of evidence, expertise and influence. Introduction. Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 1-13.
  126. Torres, C. A. (2018). Carlos Alberto Torres em entrevista: Da educação comparada aos planos futuros de um “intelectual do mundo” [Entrevista realizada por R. M. Lopes, C. F. Silva, & M. G. Alves]. Educação, 41(3), 411-417.
  127. Tröhler, D. (2014). Change management in the governance of schooling: the rise of experts, planners, and statistics in the early OECD. Teachers College Record, 116, 1-26.
  128. Unesco. (2019). A promessa das avaliações de aprendizagem em larga escala: Reconhecer os limites para desbloquear oportunidades. Unesco.
  129. Wagemaker, H. (Ed.). (2020). Reliability and validity of International Large-Scale Assessment. Understanding IEA’s comparative studies of student achievement. Hamburg: IEA Research for Education,  SpringerLink.
  130. Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2.ª ed, pp.466-485). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  131. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019a). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwideDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education40(2), 248-270. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882
  132. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019b). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reformsEducational Review71(1), 5-30.
  133. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education : A political economy of global education reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
  134. Verger, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2018). Globalización, rendición de cuentas y gobernanza educativa: Análisis de un fenómeno en expansión. Con-Ciencia Social (segunda época), 1, 59-73.
  135. Villani, M., & Oliveira, D. A. (2018). Avaliação nacional e internacional no Brasil: Os vínculos entre o PISA e o IDEB. Educação & Realidade, 43(4), 1343-1362.
  136. Volante, L. (2017). The PISA effect on global educational governance. New York: Routledge.
  137. Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Hanitzsch, T. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of journalism studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
  138. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-33). London: Sage.
  139. Wuttke, J. (2007). Uncertainties and bias in PISA. In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & M. Retzl (Eds.), PISA zufolge PISA . PISA according to PISA  (pp. 241-264). Wien: Lit-Verlag.
  140. Xiaomin, L., & Auld, E. (2020). A historical perspective on the OECD’s “humanitarian turn”: PISA for Development and the Learning Framework 2030. Comparative Education. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2020.1781397
  141. Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change.