Globalização, educação e novos modos de governação

  1. Addey, C., & Sellar, S. (2017) Why do countries participate in PISA? Understanding the role of international large-scale-assessments in global educational policy. In A. Verger, A. M. Novellin, & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (pp.97–118). London, Bloomsbury.
  2. Addey, C. & Sellar, S. (2019) Is it worth it? Rationales for (non)participation in international large-scale learning assessments. Paris: UNESCO.
  3. Addey, C., Sellar, S, Steiner-Khamsi, G., Lingard, B., & Verger, A.  (2017) The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47 (3), 1-19.
  4. Akyol, Ş. P., Krishna, K., & Wang, J. (2018). Taking PISA seriously: How accurate are low stakes exams? (Working Paper 24930). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: https://www.nber.org/papers/w24930
  5. Alexander, R. (2012). Moral panic, miracle cures and educational policy: What can we really learn from international comparison? Scottish Educational Review, 44(1), 4-21.
  6. António, A. S., Estrela, E., Galego, C., & Teodoro, A. (Eds.). (2009). Educando o cidadão global: Globalização, educação e novos modos de governação. Lisboa: Edições Universitárias Lusófonas.
  7. Aydarova, E. (2020). Knowledge for the elites, competencies for the masses: Political theatre of educational reforms in the Russian Federation. Comparative Education, 57 (1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1845060
  8. Bastin, G., & Tubaro, P. (2018). Le moment big data des sciences sociales. Revue Française de Sociologie, 59 (3), 375-394.
  9. Bauer, A., Sousa, S. M., Neto, J. L. H., Valle, R. C., & Pimenta, C. O. (2017). Iniciativas de avaliação do ensino fundamental em municípios brasileiros: Mapeamento e tendências. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 22 (71), 1-19.
  10. Bettencourt, A., Miguéns, M. & Ramalho, G. (Eds.). (2010). Impacto das avaliações internacionais nos sistemas educativos. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  11. Borer, V. L., & Lawn, M. (2013). Governing education systems by shaping data: From the past to the present, from national to international perspectives. European Educational Research Journal, 12 (1), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.48
  12. Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2015). Pesquisa em educação comparada: Abordagens e métodos. Brasília: Liber Livro.
  13. Breakspear, S. (2014). How does PISA shape education policy making? Why how we measure learning determines what counts in education. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.
  14. Carnoy, M. (2015). International test score comparisons and educational policy: A review of the critiques. Boulder: National Education Policy Center. Recuperado de https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/international-test-scores
  15. Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., Loyalka, P., Schmidt, W. H., & Zakharov, A. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between international assessment outcomes and educational production: Evidence from a longitudinal PISA-TIMSS sample.American Educational Research Journal, 53 (4), 1054–1085. doi: 10.3102/0002831216653180
  16. Carvalho, L. M. (2012). The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal, 11 (2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.172
  17. Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Sant’Ovaia, C. (2020). Depicting the faces of results-oriented regulatory processes in Portugal: National testing in policy texts. European Educational Research Journal, 19 (2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119858799
  18. Carvalho, L. M., Viseu, S., & Gonçalves, C. (2019). Bridging worlds and spreading light: Intermediary actors and the translation of knowledge for policy in Portugal. In C. E. Mølstad, & D. Pettersson (Eds.), New practices of comparison, quantification and expertise in education: Conducting empirically based research (pp. 111–126). Routledge.
  19. Cercadillo, L., & Jiménez, J. V. (Eds.). (2019). PISA como evaluación educativa supranacional: Luces y sombras en equidad. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2019.9
  20. Clarke, M., & Luna-Bazaldua, D. (2021). Primer on large-scale assessments of educational achievement. The World Bank.
  21. Conceição, C.P., Ávila, P.  Coelho, A. R., & Costa, A. F. (2019). European action plans for science–society relations: Changing buzzwords, changing the agenda. Minerva, 1-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09380-7
  22. ⌊CNE⌋ Conselho Nacional de Educação. (2013). Avaliações internacionais e desempenho dos alunos portugueses. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  23. Crato, N. (Ed.) . (2021).  Improving a country’s education, PISA 2018 results in 10 countries. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4
  24. Daniel, B. K. (2019). Big Data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (1), 101–113.
  25. Elfert, M. (2019). The OECD, American power and the rise of the “economics of education” in the 1960s. In C. Ydesen (Ed.), The OECD’s historical rise in education. The formation of a global governing complex (pp.39-61). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_3
  26. Félix, P., Perdigão, P., & Lourenço, V. (2020). Desempenho e equidade: Uma análise comparada a partir dos estudos internacionais TIMSS e PIRLS. Lisboa. Conselho Nacional de Educação.
  27. Fernandes, D., Neves, C., Tinoca, L., Viseu, S., & Henriques, S. (2019). Políticas educativas e desempenho de Portugal no PISA (2000-2015). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação.
  28. Ferreira, A., Flores, I., & Casas-Novas, T. (2017). Introdução ao estudo – Porque melhoraram os resultados PISA em Portugal? Estudo longitudinal e comparado (2000-2015). Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
  29. Freitas, R. G., Chaves, V. L., & Nozaki, H. T. (2019). Marginalisation in education systems: The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the failure discourse around the Italian education system.Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27 (127).
  30. Froese-Germain, B. (2010). The OECD, PISA and the impacts on educational policy.  Canadian Teachers’ Federation.
  31. Fuller, K., & Stevenson, H. (2019) Global education reform: Understanding the movement. Educational Review, 71 (1), 1-4.
  32. Galego, C., Ricardo, M. M. C., & Teodoro, A. (Ed.). (2018). A educação comparada para além dos números: Contextos locais, realidades nacionais e processos transnacionais. Lisboa: Edições Lusófonas.
  33. Gardinier, M. (2017). Looking back toward the future: Reflecting on the OECD’s global educational influence. In A. W. Wiseman, & C. S. Taylor (Eds.), International Perspectives on Education and Society Series (pp.247-269). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  34. Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15 (5), 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116658299
  35. Gorur, R., Sørensen, E, &  Maddox, B. (2019). Standardizing the context and contextualizing the standard: Translating PISA into PISA-D. In M. J. Prutsch (Ed.), Science, numbers and politics (pp. 301-329). Cham: Springer Nature.
  36. Grek, S. (2010). International organisations and the shared construction of policy ‘problems’: Problematisation and change in education governance in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 9 (3), 396-406. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.396
  37. Grek, S. (2012). What PISA knows and can do: Studying the role of national actors in the making of PISA. European Educational Research Journal, 11 (2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.243
  38. Grek, S., Lawn, M., & Ozga, J. (2009). O PISA e o debate das políticas na Escócia: As narrativas políticas sobre a participação escocesa na comparação internacional. Sísifo. Revista de Ciências da Educação, 10, 75-86.
  39. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). A quantitative look at the economic impact of the European Union’s educational goals. Education Economics, 28(3), 225-244.
  40. Harju-Luukkainen, H., McElvany, N., & Stang, J. (Eds.) . (2020). Monitoring student achievement in the 21st Century. European policy perspectives and assessment strategies. Cham: Springer.
  41. Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J. & Baird, J.-O. (2018).  Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer- reviewed articles on the programme for International Student Assessment.  Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353.
  42. Hopmann, S. T., & Brinek, G. (2007). Introduction: PISA according to PISA – Does PISA keep what it promises? In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & Martin Retzl (Eds.), PISA zufolge PISA – PISA according to PISA (pp. 9-20). Berlin: Lit Verlag.
  43. Hypolito, A. M., & Jorge, T. (2020). OECD, PISA and large-scale assessment in Brazil: Some Implications. Sisyphus – Journal of Education, 8 (1), 10-27.
  44. Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2017).  What happens when econometrics and psychometrics collide? An example using the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 61, 51-58.
  45. Jerrim, J., & Mossa, G. (2019). The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study. British Educational Research Journal, (45)1, 181–200. doi: 10.1002/be February 2019rj.3498
  46. Komatsu, H. &  Rappleye. J.(2017) A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education,53(2),166-191. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008
  47. Koretz, D. M. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  48. Labaree, D. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116 (9).
  49. Leimgruber, M., & Schmelzer, M. (Eds.).(2017). The OECD and the international political economy since 1948. Cham: Palgrave.
  50. Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. (2015). International comparisons of school results: A systematic review of research on large scale assessments in education. Swedish Research Council.
  51. López, A., Llavador, J., & Teodoro, A. (2017). La medida de la calidad educativa: Acerca de los rankings universitários. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, (10)2, 283-300.
  52. Lourenço, V., Duarte, A., Nunes, A., Amaral, A., Gonçalves, C., Mota, M., & Mendes, R. (2019).PISA 2018 – Portugal. Relatório Nacional. Lisboa: IAVE.
  53. Meyer, H.-D. & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global education governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  54. Morgan, C. (2011). Constructing the OECD PISA. In M. Pereya (Ed.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 1-14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  55. Moss, P., & Urban, M. (2020). The organisation for economic co-operation and development’s international early learning and child well-being study: The scores are in! Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 21 (2), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949120929466
  56. Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of global education policy . Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  57. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (vol. 1). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  58. OECD. (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  59. OECD. (2020). Education policy outlook. Portugal. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  60. Pereyra, M. P.,  Kotthoff, H.-G., & Robert Cowen, R. (Eds.). (2011). PISA under examination. Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  61. Robert, A. D., & Seguy, J.-Y. (2015). Les syndicats enseignants et PISA: Entre réserves et usages choisis. Administration & Éducation, 145, 77-83.
  62. Robertson, S. L. & Dale, R. (2008). Researching education in a globalising era: Beyond methodological nationalism, methodological statism, methodological educationism and spatial fetishism. in J. Resnik (Ed.), The production of educational knowledge in the global era (19-32). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
  63. Sánchez-Lissen, E. (2020). La influencia de las evaluaciones internacionales sobre las políticas educativas: Una mirada a la educación en europa desde PISA.  Laplage em Revista, 6 (2), 19-36.
  64. Santos, A. A., Neto, J. L. H., & Junqueira, R. D. (2017). Sistema nacional de avaliação da educação básica (Sinaeb). Proposta para atender ao disposto no plano nacional de educação. Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira.
  65. Schleicher, A. (2012). Utilizem os dados para contruir escolas melhores [Vídeo]. Recuperado de https://www.ted.com/talks/andreas_schleicher_use_data_to_build_better_schools?language=pt#t-751
  66. Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  67. Sellar, S., Thompson, G., & Rutkowski, D. (2017). The global education race: Taking the measure of PISA and international testing. Edmonton: Brush Education Inc.
  68. Singer, J. D., & Braun, H. I. (2018). Testing international education assessments.  Rankings get headlines, but often mislead. Science, 360 (6384), 38-40. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4952
  69. Singer, J. D., Braun, H. I., & Chudowsky, N. (2018). International education assessments: Cautions, conundrums, and common sense. Washington: National Academy of Education.
  70. Sjøberg, S. (2015). PISA and global educational governance – A critique of the project, its uses and implications. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11 (1), 111-127.
  71. Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should inquiry-based science education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings? Nordina, 14 (2), 186-202.
  72. Sorensen, T. B., & Robertson, S. (2020). Ordinalization and the OECD’s governance of teachers. Comparative Education Review, 64 (1), 21-45.
  73. Sousa, D., Grey, S., & Oxley, L. (2019). Comparative international testing of early childhood education: The democratic deficit and the case of Portugal. Policy Futures in Education, 17 (1), 41-58. doi:10.1177/1478210318818002
  74. Teodoro, A. (2001).  Organizações internacionais e políticas educativas nacionais: A emergência de novas formas de regulação transnacional ou uma globalização de baixa intensidade.  In  S. Stoer, L. Cortesão, & J. A. Correia (Eds.),  Crise da educação à “educação” da crise: Educação e a transnacionalização dos mecanismos de regulação social (pp. 125 – 161). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  75. Teodoro, A. (2003). Globalização e educação:  Políticas educacionais e novos modos de governação. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
  76. Teodoro, A. (2007). Nouvelles modalités de régulation transnationale des politiques éducatives. Évidences et possibilités. Carrefours de l’Éducation, 2 (24), 201-215.
  77. Teodoro, A. (2013). The political construction of European education space . In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education. The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 445 – 457). New York & Plimouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
  78. Teodoro, A. (2015). A construção da educação mundial ou o lugar da Educação Comparada no estudo das políticas (e práticas) de educação. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, (12)29, 859-877.
  79. Teodoro, A. (2016). Governando por números: Os grandes inquéritos estatísticos internacionais e a construção de uma agenda global nas políticas de educação. Em Aberto, (29)96, 41-52.
  80. Teodoro, A. (2019). The end of isolationism: examining the OECD influence in Portuguese education policies, 1955–1974. Paedagogica Historica. doi : 10.1080/00309230.2019.1606022
  81. Teodoro, A. (2020). Contesting the global development of sustainable and inclusive education. Education reform and the challenges of neoliberal globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.
  82. Teodoro, A. , & Aníbal, G. (2008). A educação em tempos de globalização. Modernização e hibridismo nas políticas educativas em Portugal. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 48, 73-91.
  83. Teodoro, A., & Guilherme, M. (Eds.). (2014). European and Latin American higher education between mirrors. Conceptual frameworks and policies of equity and social cohesion. Rotherdam & Boston: Sense Publishers.
  84. Teodoro, A., & Panait, O. M. (2017). Vers l’analyse des résistances aux normes éducatives issues de la globalisation. Éducation et Sociétés – Revue Internationale de Sociologie de l’Éducation, 39, 5-18.
  85. Teodoro, A., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.). (2005). Educação crítica e utopia. Perspectivas para o século XXI. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
  86. Thompson, G., Savage, G. C., & Lingard, B. (2016). Think tanks, edu-businesses and education policy: Issues of evidence, expertise and influence. Introduction. Australian Educational Researcher, 43 (1), 1-13.
  87. Torres, C. A. (2018). Carlos Alberto Torres em entrevista: Da educação comparada aos planos futuros de um “intelectual do mundo” [Entrevista realizada por R. M. Lopes, C. F. Silva, & M. G. Alves]. Educação, 41 (3), 411-417.
  88. Tröhler, D. (2014). Change management in the governance of schooling: the rise of experts, planners, and statistics in the early OECD. Teachers College Record, 116, 1-26.
  89. Unesco. (2019) A promessa das avaliações de aprendizagem em larga escala: Reconhecer os limites para desbloquear oportunidades. Unesco.
  90. Wagemaker, H. (Ed.). (2020). Reliability and validity of International Large-Scale Assessment. Understanding IEA’s comparative studies of student achievement. Hamburg: IEA Research for Education,  SpringerLink.
  91. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019a). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40 (2), 248-270. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882
  92. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019b). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71 (1), 5-30.
  93. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education : A political economy of global education reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
  94. Verger, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2018). Globalización, rendición de cuentas y gobernanza educativa: Análisis de un fenómeno en expansión. Con-Ciencia Social (segunda época), 1, 59-73.
  95. Villani, M., & Oliveira, D. A. (2018). Avaliação nacional e internacional no Brasil: Os vínculos entre o PISA e o IDEB. Educação & Realidade, 43(4), 1343-1362.
  96. Volante, L. (2017). The PISA effect on global educational governance. New York: Routledge.
  97. Wuttke, J. (2007). Uncertainties and bias in PISA. In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & M. Retzl (Eds.), PISA zufolge PISA . PISA according to PISA  (pp. 241-264). Wien: Lit-Verlag.
  98. Xiaomin, L., & Auld, E. (2020). A historical perspective on the OECD’s “humanitarian turn”: PISA for Development and the Learning Framework 2030. Comparative Education. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2020.1781397
  99. Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10833-019-09367-x